Casino games for real money are the games played with your own staked cash rather than free-play credits. On a British-licensed site your money sits in a client account, withdrawals are protected by licence conditions, and disputes go to an approved ADR service. On an offshore site none of that applies, and the player carries the whole risk.
I have covered this trade long enough to know which number on a casino page matters. It is never the headline deposit match. It is the gap between the moment a game pays and the moment the money is actually yours — a gap measured in licence conditions, identity paperwork, wagering multipliers and, occasionally, a term nobody reads until it bites. That gap is the theme of this page, because it is the cost a player does not see at first.
Great Britain has one of the most tightly written online gambling rulebooks in the world, and it is worth being precise about what that rulebook does and does not do. It cannot make a slot machine generous. It cannot turn a 4 per cent house edge into a living. What it can do — and largely does — is decide who holds your money while you play, how quickly you can take it back, and what happens when a site decides it would rather keep it. Offshore sites operate outside all of that, and the honest ones say so in their own terms. As of 13.11.2026, the Gambling Commission's register remains the only check that settles the question in one click.
Table of Contents12
- How Real Money Casino Games Differ From Free Play
- Two Licences, Two Very Different Deals
- How Do You Play Casino Games Online for Real Money?
- Bonus Terms and the True Cost of Free Money
- No Deposit and Free Play Costs
- Five Signs an Operator Can Be Trusted
- Identity Checks and Withdrawal Delays
- The Delay Built Into the Terms
- Where to Get Help
- What the Offshore Market Really Looks Like
- FAQ
- The Gap Between the Win and the Money
How Real Money Casino Games Differ From Free Play
Free-play games and paid games are often the same software with the same random number generator and the same theoretical return. What changes is everything around the reels: where the balance sits, who may hold it, and what has to happen before it becomes a bank transfer. That surrounding machinery is where the money is genuinely won and lost.
A few things are true across all real-money play. Every stake is a real transfer of value, so an unlucky session is a real loss and not a reset counter. Every game carries a house edge, which means the shaped expectation for a bankroll over time is downward, however good a session feels. And every real-money account sits inside a legal and contractual structure — one of two structures, in practice — that determines what you can do when something goes wrong.
Two Licences, Two Very Different Deals
Casino games online for real money can only be offered lawfully in Great Britain by an operator holding a licence from the Gambling Commission. Section 33 of the Gambling Act 2005 makes it an offence to provide gambling facilities without one, and the Commission states plainly that this includes a company licensed in another jurisdiction that operates here without a Commission licence. So the split is simple: licensed sites and unlicensed ones.
Licensed sites carry the full set of protections. Client money must be held in a separate account under licence condition 4.1.1, and the operator must publish an insolvency-protection rating under 4.2.1 — "not protected", "medium" or "high". Reverse withdrawals have been banned since 31 October 2021 under RTS 14B, so a requested withdrawal cannot be quietly turned back into a deposit. Licence condition 17.1.1 stops an operator demanding fresh identity documents at the withdrawal stage if it could reasonably have asked earlier. And an operator simply may not impose a maximum cap on how much of your deposit balance you can withdraw — the Commission's own example of a prohibited term is "You may withdraw up to £50 per day and up to £500 per week".
Offshore sites hold no Commission licence and are compared against that standard rather than judged by a different one. Some are professionally run: segregated player funds, certified random number generators, published complaints data. Others are markedly thinner. The practical differences are worth staring at directly.
| Criterion | British-licensed operator | Offshore operator |
|---|---|---|
| Regulator | Gambling Commission | Curaçao, Anjouan, Kahnawake or none |
| Self-exclusion | GamStop applies; a 6-month to 5-year block | Not connected; no block |
| Withdrawal cap in the terms | Not permitted | Common — for example 300% of a bonus |
| Wagering cap on bonuses | 10× maximum since 19 January 2026 | Typically 25× to 50× |
| Identity checks | Before you gamble, under Licence Condition 17 | Often on withdrawal |
| Dispute route | Approved ADR, free of charge | The operator's own ADR, if any |
The payment side matters too, and it is the part players underestimate. The Commission's data covering June to September 2024 recorded 44.2 million withdrawals by customers of large online operators, of which 96.3 per cent cleared automatically, 3.5 per cent cleared within 24 hours and 0.1 per cent took up to 48 hours. That is the licensed baseline. Offshore operators are under no equivalent timetable, and their terms often build in delay by design.
Curaçao Reform Efforts
Curaçao's National Ordinance on Games of Chance took effect on 24 December 2024, replacing the old master-licence and sub-licence model with direct supervision by the Curaçao Gaming Authority. The legacy orange certificates of operation ended on 15 October 2025, and the CGA's own guidance is blunt: a historic /JAZ number or legacy seal is not proof of a current licence. Licensing by the four former master licensors ceased at various points through 2024 and early 2025.
The financial scale is worth knowing. A B2C licence costs EUR 4,592 to apply for and EUR 47,450 a year thereafter — EUR 24,490 to the National Treasury and EUR 22,960 in supervisory fees. That is a real barrier, but it is not a large one by the standards of a regulated market, and it buys no player-protection obligation that a British player could enforce. An aggregator reading the CGA's public register counted 704 licences held by 698 operators, 552 of them active, as of a read on 6 November 2026.
Anjouan Licensing Status
Anjouan, part of the Union of the Comoros, licenses online gaming under legislation from 2005. B2C licence issuance costs EUR 17,828 one-time with the same again annually, and EUR 500 per additional domain — by some distance the cheapest entry in the offshore market. The regulator states that its licences contain no territorial restrictions, and then adds the qualification that matters: licence holders must comply with all applicable laws in the jurisdictions where they operate.
The jurisdiction is contested. An ABC News investigation published on 31 December 2025 reported that Anjouan Licensing Services claims to have issued more than 1,300 gambling licences at around EUR 17,000 a year each, and that a former attorney-general of the Comoros described the entity selling them as "an illegal entity", with Comorian banking laws passed in 2013 and 2015 reported to have stripped the AOFA of recognised-regulator status. Anjouan Gaming's own legal opinion — from a firm regulated in England and Wales and Quebec — is said to confirm the opposite, and that claim is a licensee's own statement rather than a regulator's. In a statement on 10 June 2026 the regulator itself said an Anjouan licence "is not, and has never been presented as, a universal authorisation to operate in every country in the world". That is a fair summary of offshore licensing generally: it is a permission to exist, not a promise of protection.
Kahnawake Licensing Approach
The Kahnawà:ke Gaming Commission has regulated interactive gaming since 1999 and describes itself as having done so longer than almost any other jurisdiction. Its structure is unusual: the Interactive Gaming Licence is held by one entity at a time — Mohawk Internet Technologies, since 1999 — and operators hold Client Provider Authorizations instead. Kahnawake operates a Logo Certificate Program, effective since 15 January 2010, which generates a "Certificate of Good Standing" confirming whether a site holds a valid permit.
Its terms are notably strict on paper, and notably unlike anything a British player would expect. Under Kahnawake rules its voluntary self-exclusion is permanent and irrevocable, and a player who breaches it forfeits any funds deposited or won to a charity chosen by the Commission. Fees are rising on 1 January 2027, with the CPA application fee going from USD 35,000 to USD 40,000.
Malta and Costa Rica Licensing Reality
The Malta Gaming Authority sits closer to the British model than the other offshore registers. A B2C licence requires a EUR 5,000 application fee, a EUR 25,000 annual fee, 5 per cent gaming tax on revenue, and minimum paid-up capital of EUR 100,000 for Type 1 and Type 2 licences. The MGA also publishes a list of Unauthorised URLs and states that any site claiming a Maltese licence while appearing on that list is making a false claim — a genuinely useful cross-check.
Costa Rica is at the other end. It operates no comprehensive gambling licensing regime and has no formal framework for issuing gambling licences; the "data processing license" that circulates in industry marketing is not a licence in any strict legal sense. Its Legislative Assembly rejected Bill No. 25,057 in early 2026, which would have introduced mandatory licensing for gambling activity. A site quoting a Costa Rican licence is quoting nothing.
How Do You Play Casino Games Online for Real Money?
For anyone who has not done it, the mechanics are unglamorous. Play casino games for real money begins with an account, not a game, and the account is where the rules live.
- Check the licence on the Commission's public register before registering for anything. The register shows the operator's licensed activities and its domain names, and the Commission advises matching both. It is the one check that cannot be faked on a site's own footer.
- Read the withdrawal section of the terms, not the bonus section. Look for a maximum withdrawal limit, a pending period, or a requirement to request withdrawals one at a time. Any of those three tells you more about the operator than its welcome offer does.
- Complete identity verification early rather than at the point of a win. Licence Condition 17 requires verification before you gamble, and LCCP guidance says operators should tell you before you deposit what documents might be needed. Offering documents up front removes the operator's excuse for a delay later.
- Set a financial limit before the first deposit. Since 31 October 2025 operators must prompt for a financial limit before a first deposit and present it as the default option under RTS 12E, with a deliberate action required to decline. It costs nothing to accept the prompt.
- If you use an e-wallet or crypto, price the round trip first. Skrill charges 2.80 per cent to move a balance to a bank account, minimum EUR 3.50, and Neteller the same 2.80 per cent with a USD 3.50 minimum. A 2.80 per cent exit fee on a £500 withdrawal is £14 that never appeared in any game's return figure.
- Keep the paper trail: deposit confirmations, withdrawal requests, and any live chat exchange. If a dispute goes to an ADR provider, the operator's own internal complaints procedure must come first, and evidence is what shortens the road.
Free play is the sensible way to learn a game's mechanics without paying for the lesson. A demo balance and a real one run the same mathematics, so the only thing free play cannot teach is how a real loss feels. That part is best learned at a stake small enough not to matter.
Bonus Terms and the True Cost of Free Money
If there is one thing this market turns on, it is the bonus term sheet, and in Britain the sheet was rewritten on 19 January 2026. Social Responsibility Code 5.1.1 now caps wagering requirements at ten times, defines a wagering requirement as a demand that a customer make wagers totalling a particular value before funds become withdrawable, and bans mixed-product incentives — betting, casino, bingo and lottery may no longer be bundled inside a single offer. The Commission chose a cap over an outright ban and said the change "will take out extreme levels as some licensees currently apply up to 60 times wagering requirements".
The first-time experience is straightforward. A bonus is credited, the deposit and bonus balances must be displayed separately, and the wagering requirement attaches only to the bonus — LCCP guidance is explicit that requirements must not apply to play with the deposit balance. The withdrawal position is equally clear: a player may withdraw their deposit balance at any time, including while a bonus is pending or active, and a maximum limit on withdrawing the deposit balance is a prohibited term.
Later, the picture depends on where the account sits. Offshore, the multipliers run higher — trade coverage describes welcome offers typically at 25× to 40×, with no-deposit bonuses at 40× to 60× and cashout caps of €50 to €100, though those ranges come from industry comparisons rather than a regulator. A published offshore term book shows what that looks like in writing: one operator reserves the right to limit withdrawals from bonus-generated winnings to 300 per cent of the credited bonus amount, voiding the excess, and caps the maximum bet while wagering at €5 for regular players. Another applies a max bet of 20 per cent of the deposited amount and warns that breaching it may result in account closure and forfeiture of winnings.
The warning signs are consistent, and they are all in the small print. A wagering requirement above ten times on a British site should not exist at all. A sticky bonus — one that can be wagered but never withdrawn — effectively makes the bonus a playing token rather than money. A withdrawal cap, a maximum bet while wagering, or a clause reserving sole discretion to void winnings are each, on their own, enough to tell you what the operator thinks of its customers. UK guidance requires that terms setting out promotional play restrictions specify all prohibited patterns of play and not reserve sole discretion to the operator, and that terms on fraud and multiple accounts sit in a separate document from promotional terms. When those two are glued together in one clause, the drafting is telling you where the money goes.
No Deposit and Free Play Costs
No deposit casino games for real money are the sharpest example of a visible benefit and an invisible bill. A no-deposit bonus is genuinely free money to play with — on a British site it now carries a wagering cap of ten times at most, alongside all the other protections. On an offshore site the same offer typically carries a multiplier of 40× to 60× and a cashout ceiling in the €50 to €100 range, and some operators state that no-deposit bonuses may not be redeemed consecutively, with a second in a row potentially forfeiting the winnings.
The arithmetic is unforgiving. A €50 cashout cap on a bonus with a 50× requirement is a game where the maximum possible outcome is fixed at the amount that, for most players, is the point at which the exercise stops being worth the time. Add a 2.80 per cent e-wallet exit fee and a currency-conversion charge of up to 4.49 per cent, and the headline number is a marketing figure, not an expected value.
The same logic applies to free spins and free-play promotions. Free play with no cashout is a demo with better artwork. Free play with a cashout is a lottery ticket with terms attached, and the terms deserve the same reading as a bonus's.
Five Signs an Operator Can Be Trusted
The signs that matter are checkable in an evening, and none of them requires trusting a review.
The Licence Matches the Register
Check the Gambling Commission's public register and match both the operator's licensed activities and its domain names against the site in front of you. The Commission advises exactly this, and it is the only check that cannot be dressed up. A site claiming a licence it does not hold is not making an administrative error.
The Withdrawal Terms Are Short and Boring
Look for an absence, not a presence: no maximum withdrawal limit, no pending period counted in days, no one-at-a-time rule. The Commission found that a term allowing only one withdrawal request at a time, blocking another until the first was authorised, was unfair under the Consumer Rights Act 2015 — that finding sits inside a £900,000 regulatory settlement announced on 21 October 2026. Dull withdrawal terms are a good sign.
The Bonus Cap Is Published and Small
On a licensed site, look for a wagering requirement at or below ten times and no mixed-product offer. On an offshore site, treat anything above 40× as a term designed to be unreachable, and anything with a cashout cap as a bonus you are borrowing rather than receiving.
The Money Sits in a Separate Account With a Named Rating
Under licence condition 4.2.1 the operator must state in writing whether your funds are protected in the event of insolvency, at what level, and by what method — and you must acknowledge receipt before you can gamble with funds on first deposit. Read the rating. "Not protected" is a real answer that some operators give honestly, and it is worth knowing before rather than after.
Complaints Go Somewhere Independent, Free of Charge
A licensed operator must let you refer an unresolved dispute to an approved ADR entity at no cost once eight weeks have passed since your complaint, under social responsibility code 6.1.1, and you must have been through the operator's own procedure first. The Commission approves providers including IBAS, eCOGRA and CEDR; IBAS reports 100 per cent operator compliance with decisions in the consumer's favour in both 2023-24 and 2024-25. An operator with no independent route is asking you to accept its own verdict.
Identity Checks and Withdrawal Delays
If a single mechanism decides whether a real-money session ends with a bank transfer or with a locked account, it is identity verification. In Britain the framework is set by Licence Condition 17, introduced on 7 May 2019, which requires licensees to obtain and verify information establishing identity before a customer is permitted to gamble, and the information must include name, address and date of birth.
The first time, it is usually invisible. Most operators verify electronically by matching the account against databases such as credit reference agencies and the electoral roll, in which case no documents are needed at all — the Commission says the process may be instant when electronic verification succeeds. The catch is that it must be done on accurate information: the Commission has warned that onboarding on partial or equivocal data — initials instead of a forename, a nickname, a commercial address — is not sufficient, and that a middle name used in place of a forename can mismatch records held elsewhere, including GamStop's, undermining an exclusion. That is not a small failure. It is the mechanism by which a self-exclusion quietly stops working.
Later, the rules differ by market. Offshore sites frequently defer verification until a withdrawal is requested, which is exactly the pattern the Commission has criticised: it reports that over a quarter of complaints reaching its Contact Centre concern identity verification, a concern customers raise when documents are demanded only at the point of a win. Licence Condition 17.1.1 prohibits requiring additional information at withdrawal if the licensee could reasonably have requested it earlier, though that does not override an anti-money-laundering obligation it must meet at that moment. Under the Money Laundering Regulations 2017, a remote casino must identify and verify when a customer deposits or withdraws €2,000 or more, and the threshold applies to linked transactions as well as single ones.
The warning signs are familiar once named. A site that asks for nothing at all until you win is not being relaxed, it is building a delay into the payout. A site that asks for a bank statement without explaining its legal basis is going beyond what it needs. And no operator in Britain may confiscate a deposit balance on the grounds that identity verification has not been completed — the Commission's position is that deposited money is not the operator's to keep, and it has the CMA's view on unfair terms behind it.
The Delay Built Into the Terms
Reverse withdrawals have been banned since 31 October 2021, and the Commission's reasoning was explicit: the function presented a risk to engaged and vulnerable gamblers, including the temptation to keep going. That ban removed the most effective delay device ever built into a casino account. Its absence is the clearest marker of a licensed site.
Offshore, the delay has simply moved elsewhere. Terms that permit only one withdrawal request at a time, caps expressed as a percentage of a bonus, manual reviews of every fifth or tenth withdrawal, a maximum bet while wagering — each one moves the moment of payment further away. None of these is illegal offshore. All of them are the cost a player does not see at first.
The legitimate ones deserve a mention, because not every delay is a cheat. Where an operator suspects money laundering it must submit a suspicious activity report and obtain a defence from the National Crime Agency before moving customer funds — an obligation the Commission accepts may necessitate a delay in payouts, while insisting it gives no right to confiscate deposits. Seasoned observers can tell the difference between an operator explaining a legal duty and one reciting a clause.
Where to Get Help
GamStop Online is the national online self-exclusion scheme, run by The National Online Self Exclusion Scheme Limited and free to use. It blocks registration and use of online accounts with gambling companies licensed in Great Britain. The name is frequently mistyped as "gamestop", which is a slip worth knowing about because the written form is always GamStop. Registration takes a few minutes but the block can take up to 24 hours to take effect, and periods run for 6 months, 1 year, 5 years, or 5 years with auto-renewal.
Two facts about exclusion deserve stating flatly, because they are frequently misrepresented. A self-exclusion cannot be cancelled during its term — the Group's 2025 annual report devotes a section to its refusal to remove registrations early. And once the chosen period ends, the exclusion stays in place until the person contacts GamStop to remove it; if they do not, the scheme holds the data through a further automatic seven-year period during which operators are told they were previously excluded. So a GamStop block is not a pause. It is a period that runs its full length unless and until someone actively ends it. For completeness: an offshore site is not covered by GamStop, and the fact that it accepts someone who is excluded is not a feature. It is the absence of the protection.
The numbers make the point about scale. GamStop recorded 117,756 new registrations during 2025 and had 561,983 active exclusions at the end of that year. The first half of 2026 brought a 16 per cent year-on-year increase in registrations, with May 2026 setting a record of 12,236 sign-ups, and by July 2026 the register stood at 614,738 people, more than one in two of whom had chosen the maximum five-year term. Under-25s accounted for nearly one in three registrations in that half-year. Registrants in 2025 split 94.3 per cent male and 5.7 per cent female.
Help is free, and it is not rationed. The National Gambling Helpline, operated by GamCare, is on 0808 8020 133, 24 hours a day, every day of the year — for callers in Wales, 0808 2819 265. BeGambleAware, the public-facing brand of the charity GambleAware, directs people to the same line. GamFam supports families and friends, Gamblers Anonymous England, Wales & Ulster runs around 250 meeting locations on 0330 094 0322, and NHS England had opened 15 specialist gambling clinics across England from 2019, with 8 regional services receiving almost 5,000 referrals a year. Blocking software is a sensible extra layer: BetBlocker states it blocks over 1,368,000 gambling websites and 3,100 apps and is free worldwide, while Gamban is free for residents of Wales and costs £4.99 a month or £29.99 a year in England and Scotland following the end of TalkBanStop funding on 31 March 2026. Bank-level gambling blocks, available from the eleven banks the Commission lists, work at card level and decline payments to gambling merchants — with a 48- or 72-hour cooling-off before gambling transactions are allowed again.
What the Offshore Market Really Looks Like
Around the edges of this subject there is a set of numbers that two camps quote at each other, and it is worth seeing both. Gambling Commission analysis published on 5 November 2026 estimates that, across the whole population including non-gamblers, 0.6 per cent of respondents had engaged with an illegal gambling website in the past four weeks and a further 0.4 per cent in the past 12 months. Among people who had gambled online in the past four weeks, that rises to 2.5 per cent plus 1.5 per cent. On that reading the black market is real but small.
The commercial estimates are louder. H2 Gambling Capital puts the amount staked with illegal operators in the UK at £16.6 billion in 2025, up from about £5 billion in 2019, with the proportion of gambling happening legally falling from 97 per cent to 92 per cent. A Frontier Economics study for the Betting and Gaming Council put black-market online stakes at £2.7 billion a year. Yield Sec, analysing for the Campaign for Fairer Gambling, put the online market at £8.8 billion in gross gaming revenue in 2025, split 91 per cent regulated and 9 per cent unregulated. The Commission's own October 2024 methodology notes an obvious limitation: it does not capture activity hidden by VPNs.
Enforcement is real but uneven in effect. Since April 2024 the Commission's Illegal Markets team has issued 3,140 cease and desist and disruption notices and referred 447,778 search-engine URLs, securing 287,961 removals, and it measured an average 32 per cent fall in engagement across 160 illegal sites. The mechanism matters more than the total: registrar blocks and website suspensions produced the largest average fall in engagement at 91 per cent each, ahead of GEO IP blocking at 60 per cent and Google removal at 30 per cent. Taking a site out of search results makes it harder to find. It does not stop anyone who has the address. The Commission's own industry warning notice of 20 January 2025 noted that unlicensed sites available to GB consumers often target customers who have self-excluded and may have inadequate social responsibility and anti-money-laundering controls — which is the point at which a marketing decision about where to deposit becomes a question about who is holding the money.
FAQ
Can you play casino games online for real money?
Yes, if the operator holds a Gambling Commission licence. Section 33 of the Gambling Act 2005 makes it an offence to provide gambling facilities in Great Britain without one, and the Commission states this includes a company licensed elsewhere that operates here unlicensed. Licensed sites must verify identity before you gamble under Licence Condition 17, hold your money in a separate client account, and allow withdrawal of your deposit balance at any time without a cap. Offshore sites sit outside all of it.
Are no deposit casino games for real money genuinely free?
They are free to play, not free to cash out. On a licensed site the wagering requirement is capped at ten times since 19 January 2026, which makes a modest win reachable. Offshore, no-deposit bonuses typically carry multipliers of 40× to 60× and a cashout ceiling in the €50 to €100 range, and some operators state that taking two in a row can forfeit the winnings. The ceiling, not the multiplier, is what usually decides the outcome.
What is the best way to play casino games online for real money?
The choice worth making is not which game but which licence. Check the Commission's public register and match both the operator's activities and its domain names against the site. Then read the withdrawal terms before the bonus terms — a maximum withdrawal limit, a pending period, or a one-withdrawal-at-a-time rule each says more than any welcome offer. After that, the specific game matters far less than the exit terms attached to it.
Do online casino games for real money pay out quickly?
On licensed sites, usually very quickly. Commission data for June to September 2024 recorded 44.2 million withdrawals from customers of large operators, of which 96.3 per cent cleared automatically, 3.5 per cent within 24 hours and 0.1 per cent in up to 48 hours. Offshore operators face no equivalent timetable. Complaints about withdrawals remain the single biggest subject raised with the Commission, and delays usually trace back to the terms rather than to the payment network.
Is there a maximum I can withdraw from casino games for real money?
On a British-licensed site, no — a term imposing a maximum limit on withdrawing your deposit balance is a prohibited term, and the Commission's example of one is "up to £50 per day and up to £500 per week". Offshore, caps are routine: one published term book limits withdrawals from bonus-generated winnings to 300 per cent of the credited bonus, voiding the rest. The cap is the term to look for first.
How do I check a casino is licensed in Great Britain?
Use the Gambling Commission's public register and check two things: that the operator's licensed activities cover what you intend to do, and that the domain name you are on appears against that licence. A site can hold a licence for a different activity, or display a certificate belonging to another operator. Curaçao's regulator makes the same warning about its own seals — if the certificate shows a different domain, the site is unauthorised.
The Gap Between the Win and the Money
Casino games for real money are exactly what they look like — staked cash, a house edge, and a payout mechanism attached — and the whole of a player's advantage lies in that third part, because the first two are mathematics and the third is contractual. A British licence writes a floor under the contract: your money separated, your deposit balance uncapped, no reverse withdrawals, identity checked before you gamble rather than after you win, and an independent adjudicator at the end of it. An offshore licence writes nothing of the kind, and often writes the opposite.
The cost a player does not see at first is rarely a rigged game. It is a term. It is a 300 per cent cashout cap, a 50× multiplier on a prize ceiling of €50, a 2.80 per cent exit fee, a document request arriving on the day of a win, a middle name on a registration form that quietly unhooks a self-exclusion. Each is legal somewhere and none is unavoidable. The Commission's Contact Centre still hears more about withdrawals than about anything else, and in the four months to September 2024 it counted 44.2 million withdrawals of which 96.3 per cent cleared without a human touching them. That 96.3 per cent is what the rulebook buys. Nothing in an offshore licence buys it — and no offshore site is a way round a self-exclusion, which runs its full term and then stays in place until GamStop is contacted to remove it. If any of this is weighing on anyone, the National Gambling Helpline is free on 0808 8020 133, 24 hours a day.
